For years they've called Singapore the nanny state, not just because the sale of chewing gum was banned but also because the government knows best, controls all and likes everything neat and proper.
So what would the nanny say about opening a megacasino?
SINGAPORE: Singapore's first casino-resort partially opened yesterday. The decision to allow casinos followed a rare national debate though the government's desired outcome was never in doubt. Casino Overview Housed inside one of the world's most iconic structures, the casino at Marina Bay Sands encompasses more than 15,000 square meters of gaming space spread over 4 levels. Boasting one of the world's largest Swarovski crystal chandeliers, the casino is also home to over 600 table games, more than 1,500 slots and a wide array of. B9 Casino is a dedicated Singapore Online Casino which is deeply committed to serving secure and unbiased esports & sports betting, live casino, slots games, Lotto 4D,fish shooting games and several more online casino games. Our secure, sophisticated, and technologically advanced platform for online betting and gambling have made us the best.
In the past the government insisted it never would happen. 'Over my dead body' is how Singapore's founding leader, Lee Kuan Yew, once put it, rejecting gambling as an affront to the Singaporean ethic of hard work and clean living.
Lee is retired but remains Singapore's elder statesman, and his son is the prime minister. But surprisingly the government is moving to permit casino gambling, even as a good number of citizens remain opposed.
That has led to a second very unusual situation: a vigorous public debate over a sensitive political issue, which in this tightly run city-state is akin to--heaven forbid--talking back to your nanny.
As the government solicits bids from international casino operators, members of Singapore's diverse religious and ethnic community--Christians, Buddhists, Muslims, Hindus--are speaking out against the idea, while a citizen group called Families Against the Casino Threat in Singapore has organized a Web site and cell phone text-message campaign. It says it has collected 27,000 signatures opposing the casino.
Singapore's Cabinet, which also is said to be divided over the idea, is listening to the debate and intends to make a decision this spring.
'At the end of the day, it's a bet on whether you think you can control the spillover evil effects and how much confidence you have in the maturity of the population,' Lee was quoted as saying recently at a business conference.
Political observers see different motives and implications in what is happening, with the most fascinating analysis suggesting that Singapore is on the cusp of a new era of openness.
'The casino has mobilized a lot of Singaporeans to work against what's seen as the government's interests,' said Hanshih Lee, a Singaporean magazine editor and former newspaper business columnist. 'Once [the public] gets a taste of this, they will try it with other things.'
Putting it in nanny-state terms, it's as if the government finally may be acknowledging that its charges are growing up.
The debate 'speaks volumes about modern Singapore and the way the government is trying to give its citizens more of a voice in society, distancing itself from the nanny-state style of government that characterized the country's first 35 years,' said a foreign diplomat here who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Before taking office last year, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said it was time to 'cut the apron strings' because 'nanny should not look after everything all the time.'
Nightlife and racy magazines
Looking around Singapore, a tropical nation of 4.35 million people with gleaming office towers and clean streets, there is a bit more of a cosmopolitan feel than a decade ago. The city has a vibrant nightlife scene and several large international bookstores that even sell racy magazines. Two years ago the government made a big deal of permitting a bungee-jumping arcade to open along the river.
In another high-profile move, homosexuals now are recruited for government jobs, though homosexual activity technically remains illegal.
There also is a lot that has not changed in Singapore, a country whose reputation was cemented in 1994 when the government punished 18-year-old American Michael Fay with a caning for vandalism.
The caning incident--which still comes up in conversations here--reflected Singapore's obsession with order and discipline. Those same concerns have colored Singapore's docile brand of democracy, in which directly challenging the government is considered out of bounds. Opposition politicians are all but shut out by the ruling party while the major news media rest in the hands of government friends. A predictable political system is seen as best for developing the economy.
None of that cautiousness is likely to change overnight. It says enough about Singapore-style politics that many observers in Asia think authoritarian China considers Singapore's open-but-closed system as a model for its future.
Gillian Koh, a research fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies in Singapore, thinks the main reason the government is encouraging debate over the casino is that it had been on record as opposing the idea and it can protect its credibility by allowing the nation to be swayed by economic arguments for it.
'Very often people say that the government invites public consultation, but you aren't sure if it's for real or icing on the cake,' Koh said. In this instance, she said, 'They can afford to be honest because the Cabinet is split.'
The argument in favor of the casino is that it will boost the economy and stanch the estimated $1 billion in gambling money that leaves the country each year for Macau and other gaming centers.
The proposed casino would be part of a large-scale entertainment and tourism center. To address concerns that the poor will be enticed to gamble, the government would require Singaporeans to pay a $60 daily entrance fee. Foreigners would be exempt.
A bid to reinvent itself
But the government also sees something bigger in the casino debate. Rather than focusing on political openness, it is pitching the casino as part of a broader campaign to reinvent Singapore and cast off the image of nannyhood. For years Singapore has lamented that it had become too strait-laced and was in danger of falling behind in the global economic competition.
'Really, it is a question of the maturity of our society and the type of society which we want to have going forward,' Vivian Balakrishnan, a government minister, said in an interview. 'We all know that we live in a rapidly changing, highly competitive world--one in which we will need all Singaporeans to grow up, to be responsible, to take responsibility for their own actions, including facing the consequences of their choices.'
Born | Michael Peter Fay May 30, 1975 (age 45) |
---|---|
Nationality | American |
Education | Singapore American School |
Occupation | Casino manager |
Known for | Being caned in Singapore |
Criminal charge(s) | Violation of the Vandalism Act |
Criminal penalty | Six strokes of the cane, ultimately reduced to four |
Criminal status | Released |
Parents |
|
Michael Peter Fay (born May 30, 1975) is an American citizen who caused a temporary strain in Singapore–United States relations in 1994 when he was sentenced to six strokes of the cane for theft and vandalism at the age of 18 and lived in the country. Fay pleaded guilty, but he later claimed that he was advised that such a plea would preclude caning and that his confession was false, that he never vandalized any cars, and that the only crime he committed was stealing road signs.
Although caning is a routine court sentence in Singapore, its use caused controversy in the United States, and Fay's case was believed to be the first caning involving an American citizen.[2] The number of cane strokes in Fay's sentence was ultimately reduced from six to four after United States officials including then U.S. President Bill Clinton had requested for leniency.
Fay was born in St. Louis, Missouri.[1] His mother, Randy, divorced his father, George, when he was eight.[1] As a child, he was diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) which, his lawyer later claimed, did not contribute to Fay committing vandalism and theft in Singapore.[3]
Although Fay mostly lived with his father after the divorce, he later moved to Singapore to live with his mother and stepfather, Marco Chan, and was enrolled in the Singapore American School.[1]
In October 1993, The Straits Times, Singapore's main English-language newspaper, reported that car vandalism in Singapore was on the rise.[4] Cars parked at apartment blocks were being damaged with hot tar, paint remover, red spray paint, and hatchets. Taxi drivers complained that their tires were slashed. In the city center, cars were found with deep scratches and dents. One man complained that he had to refinish his car six times in six months.[4]
The Singapore police eventually arrested 16-year-old Andy Shiu Chi Ho, a Chinese citizen from Hong Kong. He was not caught vandalizing cars, but was charged with driving his father's car without a license. After questioning Shiu, the police questioned several foreign students from the Singapore American School, including Fay, and charged them with more than 50 counts of vandalism.[4] Fay pleaded guilty to vandalizing the cars in addition to stealing road signs. He later maintained that he was advised that such a plea would preclude caning and that his confession was false, that he never vandalized any cars, and that the only crime he committed was stealing signs.[5][6]
Under the 1966 Vandalism Act, originally passed to curb the spread of political graffiti and which specifically penalized vandalism of government property,[1] Fay was sentenced on March 3, 1994, to four months in jail, a fine of S$3,500 (US$2,514 or £1,914 at the time), and six strokes of the cane.[7] Shiu, who pleaded not guilty, was sentenced to eight months in prison and 12 strokes of the cane.[8]
Fay's lawyers appealed, arguing that the Vandalism Act provided caning only for indelible forms of graffiti vandalism, and that the damaged cars had been cheaply restored to their original condition.[9]
The official position of the United States government was that although it recognized Singapore's right to punish Fay within the due process of law, the punishment of caning was excessive for a teenager who committed a non-violent crime. The United States Embassy in Singapore pointed out that, while the graffiti and physical damage to the cars was not permanent, caning could leave Fay with permanent physical scars.[1]
Bill Clinton, the President of the United States, called Fay's punishment extreme and mistaken, and pressured the Singapore government to grant Fay clemency from caning. Two dozen United States senators signed a letter to the Singapore government also appealing for clemency.[3]
The Singaporean government pointed out that Singaporeans who break the law faced the same punishments as Fay,[2] and stated that Singapore's laws had kept the city free of vandalism and violence of the kind seen in American cities such as New York City.[10]
Nevertheless, Ong Teng Cheong, the then head of state of Singapore, commuted Fay's caning from six to four strokes as a gesture of respect toward President Clinton.[11][3] Shiu's sentence was later also reduced, from 12 strokes to six, after a similar clemency appeal. Fay was caned on May 5, 1994, at Queenstown Remand Centre.[12][13]
Following Fay's sentence, the case received wide coverage by the American and international media.[14]The New York Times, The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times ran editorials and op-eds condemning the punishment.[15]USA Today reported that caning involved 'bits of flesh fly[ing] with each stroke.'[16] The punishment had to be accomplished by trained warders holding high grades in martial arts.[17]
Public opinion in the United States was mixed. A survey of 23,000 people conducted by the National Polling Network (now merged with the Pew Research Center) found that up to 60% 'favored whipping and other harsh sentences as an acceptable deterrent to crime in the United States'.[18][19][20]
Describing the caning day, Fay told Reuters he did not know the time had come for punishment when he was taken from his cell. He said he was bent over a trestle so his buttocks stuck out, with his hands and feet buckled to the structure. He was naked but with a protective rubber pad fixed to his back. The flogger, a doctor, a nurse and prison officials were also present.
Fay told Reuters the caner walked sharply forward three steps to build power. 'They go 'Count one'—you hear them yell it really loud—and a few seconds later they come, I guess I would call it charging at you with a rattan cane.' He noted that a prison officer guided him through the ordeal saying: 'OK Michael, three left; OK Michael, two left; OK one more, you're almost done.' Fay reported that when the fourth stroke was delivered he was immediately unbuckled from the trestle and taken to a cell to recover. The caning, which Fay estimated took one minute, left a 'few streaks of blood' running down his buttocks, and seven weeks later, left three dark-brown scar patches on his right buttock and four lines each about half-an-inch wide on his left buttock. He said that the wounds hurt for about five days after which they eventually healed. 'The first couple of days it was very hard to sit,' Fay reported, but he said he was able to walk just fine after the caning.[21]
After his release from prison in June 1994, Fay was deported and ultimately returned to the United States to live with his biological father.[22] He gave several television interviews, including one with his American lawyer on CNN with Larry King on June 29, 1994, in which he admitted stealing road signs but denied vandalizing cars.[23] He also claimed that he was ill-treated during questioning, but had shaken hands with the caning operative after his four strokes had been administered.
It was reported by a Singaporean news outlet in August 2018 that Fay was currently working as a casino manager in Cincinnati.[24]
Several months after returning to the United States, Fay suffered burns to his hands and face after a butane incident.[25][26][27] He was subsequently admitted to the Hazelden rehabilitation program for butane abuse.[25] He claimed that sniffing butane 'made [him] forget what happened in Singapore.'[28] In 1996, he was cited in Florida for a number of violations, including careless driving, reckless driving, not reporting a crash, and having an open bottle of alcohol in a car.[29] Later, in 1998, still in Florida, Fay was arrested for possession of marijuana and drug paraphernalia, charges to which he confessed but was acquitted[30] because of technical errors in his arrest.[31]
During an interview with CCTV in June 2004, Lee Kuan Yew, then Senior Minister of Singapore, said that Fay hit his father upon his return to the United States, which was suppressed by the American media.[32] In June 2010, Fay's case was recalled in international news, after another westerner in Singapore, Swiss IT consultant Oliver Fricker, was sentenced to five months in jail and three strokes of the cane for vandalizing a train.[33]
Season 19, episode 18 of Saturday Night Live cold-opened with a sketch of Michael Fay's caning. The players included host Emilio Estevez as Fay, Kevin Nealon administering the caning, Rob Schneider as the warden, and Phil Hartman as the doctor.[34][35]
In September 1994 'Weird Al' Yankovic released a song, 'Headline News', which satirized the Fay case along with the Tonya Harding and Bobbitts stories.[36]
'Headwriter', a 1994 episode of The Larry Sanders Show opened with Sanders making a joke about Fay in the character's opening monologue: 'Michael Fay is back in the U.S. from Singapore. And I can assure you, that is a long flight, especially when you have to stand the whole way.'[37]
Dr. Dre and Ice Cube referenced the caning in their 1994 single 'Natural Born Killaz'.[38]
The case inspired a 1995 Simpsons episode, 'Bart vs. Australia', in which Australia is to punish Bart via 'booting'—a kick in the buttocks using a giant boot (later reduced to a shoe).[39]
The 1994 professional wrestling event When Worlds Collide promoted by Eastern Championship Wrestling featured a 'Signapore canes' match, with the loser to receive ten strikes from a cane.[40]
Mr. Fay. I have some good news, and bad news.